Publication Ethics

The publication ethics for the Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika are based on the guidelines set by COPE (Committee On Publication Ethics) and are outlined as follows:

Author

  • Take full responsibility for the article, which is a new and original work that has not been submitted.
  • It is not possible to modify the content of the owned works that have been published in other journals.
  • When the submitted article is being reviewed, then the author should not apply concurrently to other journals. 
  • Authors are allowed to publish their works in other journals only after receiving an official rejection from Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, or if they withdraw the article for any reason before it is sent to the reviewer.
  • Must inform the issuer of the data inaccuracies in its published works so that the correction or revocation of the article can be done.
  • Must contribute significantly and be responsible for anything related to the article.

  
Reviewer

  • Reviewing all submissions objectively, fairly, and professionally.
  • Informing if an ethical error is found in the article to the leader/Deputy editor for Follow-up.
  • It is your responsibility to verify the authenticity of the article and exercise caution against plagiarism and excessive publication.
  • Should not reduce, add to, and discuss the content of articles without permission.
  • Follow the allotted time for the review process. The renewal request for review submission is in consideration of the editor-in-chief.


Editorial Board

  • The Editorial Board is actively contributing to the journal's development and fostering a supportive environment.
  • Act as editor of the journal.
  • Continue to support and promote the journal.
  • Editors can accept, decline, or request a script change based on the reviewer's recommendation results. Editors can also consult the editor-in-chief in making article publication decisions.
  • The editor evaluates that each initial script is original. Editors must organise the manuscript fairly and wisely.
  • Editors Choose the reviewer according to his expertise by noting the type of research from the author's submitted article.
  • Editors must ensure that information about the manuscript submitted by the author is kept confidential.


Editor-in-Chief

  • Evaluate the articles fairly and solely on the basis of intellect.
  • Make sure of the article's confidentiality, and do not disclose any information regarding it to anyone other than those involved in the publishing process.
  • Have a responsibility to decide when and which articles to publish. Actively seek the views of councillors, examiners, and authors on how to improve/enhance the image and visibility of the journal.
  • Provide clear instructions to potential contributors regarding the filing process and what to expect from the author.
  • Choose the right editor for the review process of the article.