Eksplorasi TPACK dalam Mendukung Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi

Authors

  • Latief Sahidin Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Kadir Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Salim Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Rahmad Pradjono Universitas Halu Oleo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36709/jpm.v13i2.15

Keywords:

efikasi diri, HOTS , TPACK

Abstract

Peserta didik saat ini dituntut untuk memiliki keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi. Untuk itu, guru harus berperan penting untuk menanamkan HOTS kepada peserta didik. Namun literatur yang ada dalam konteks pengetahuan guru di Indonesia menunjukkan guru masih kesulitan mengembangkan pembelajaran berorientasi HOTS. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat pengetahuan TPACK guru, serta faktor-faktornya yang mempengaruhi TPACK guru dalam pembelajaran berorientasi HOTS. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode survei untuk mengumpulkan data. Enam belas guru dari sekolah menengah pertama dan sekolah menengah atas di Sulawesi Tenggara berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner. Analisis deskriptif dan tematik dilakukan untuk menganalisis data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa; teknologi yang digunakan untuk pembelajaran berorientasi HOTS adalah Google classroom (83,3%) dan whatsapp (83,3%); secara umum tingkat pengetahuan TPACK guru berkategori baik; (3) secara umum guru belum mengintegrasikan unsur HOTS dalam mata pelajarannya; semua responden mengintegrasikan TPACK di kelas dan setuju bahwa TPACK dapat mendukung pembelajaran berorientasi HOTS. Temuan juga menunjukkan bahwa faktor guru seperti sikap terhadap teknologi, efikasi diri sangat mempengaruhi pengetahuan TPACK guru. Penelitian ini dapat berkontribusi dalam memperluas pemahaman pembaca tentang tingkat pengetahuan TPACK guru serta faktor-faktor yang dapat berkontribusi untuk mendukung pembelajaran berorientasi HOTS di kelas

References

Alim, Linda, Gunawan & Saad. (2019). The Effectiveness of Google Classroom as an Instructional Media: a Case of State Islamic Institute of Kendari, Indonesia. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(2), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7227

Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Computers & Education Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT – TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computer Education, 52(1), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006.

Annisah, S. (2014). Alat Peraga Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Tarbawiyah, 11(1), 1–15.

Aviyanti, I. (2016). Penerapan Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) dalam Pembelajaran Ditinjau dari Status Sertifikasi , Lama Mengajar, dan Bidang Studi Guru. (Program Studi Pendidikan Ekonomi Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta)

Azhar, & Iqbal. (2018). Effectiveness of Google Classroom: Teachers Perception. Prizren Social Science Journal, 2(2), 52–66.

Chai, S. C., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C., & Tan, L.L. W. (2011). Computers & Education Modeling primary school preservice teachers ’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK ) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology ( ICT ). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184–1193.

Cheng, K. (2017). A survey of native language teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in Taiwan. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1349805

Drew, S. V. (2012). Open up the ceiling on the Common Core State Standards: Preparing students for 21st‐century literacy—now. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(4), 321–330.

Gon, & Rawekar. (2017). Effectivity of E-Learning through Whatsapp as a Teaching Learning Tool. MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, 4(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.18311/mvpjms.v4i1.8454

Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 18(3), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003.

Griffin, P., Care, E. & McGaw, B. (2012). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Jang, S., & Tsai, M. (2012). Computers & Education Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers & Education, 59(2), 327–338.

Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., & Terry, L. (2013). What knowledge is of most worth: Teacher knowledge for 21st century learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 127–140.

Kleickmann, T. (2012). Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Role of Structural Differences in Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 20(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112460398.

Koehler & Mishra, (2005). “Teachers Learning Technology by Design,” J. Comput. Teach. Educ., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 94–102, doi: 10.1.1.130.7937.

Koh, J. H. L, Chai, C. S. & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Examining practicing teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) pathways: A structural equation modeling approach. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 41(4), 793–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s112 51-012-9249-y

Koh, & Chai. (2016). Seven design frames that teachers use when considering technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computer Education, 102, 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.003.

Lestiyanawati, R., & Widyantoro, A. (2020). Strategies and Problems Faced by Indonesian Teachers in Conducting E-Learning System During COVID-19 Outbreak. Culture, Literature, Linguistics, and English Teaching, 2(1), 71-82. https://doi.org/ 10.32699/cllient.v2i1.1271.

Liang, X., & Luo, J. (2016). Micro-lesson Design: A Typical Learning Activity to Develop Pre-service Mathematics Teachers’ TPACK Framework. Proceedings - 2015 International Conference of Educational Innovation Through Technology, 259–263

Lin, T. C.. Tsai, C. C., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M. H. (2013). Identifying Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK). Journal Science Education Technology, 22(3), 325–336. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10956-012-9396-6.

McFarlane, A., & Sakellariou, S. (2002). The role of ICT in science education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32, 219-232.

Milner-bolotin, (2015). Technology-Enhanced Teacher Education for 21st Century: Challenges and Possibilities. Emerging Technologies for STEAM Education, 137–156.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1-16.

Murtiyasa, B., & Atikah, M. D. (2021). Kemampuan TPACK Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika pada Mata Kuliah Praktikum Pembuatan Alat Peraga Matematika. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 2577-2590.

Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives’ digital literacy?.Computer Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016.

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do, student performance in mathematics, reading and science volume 1. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Rahayu, D. V., Muhtadi, D., & Ridwan, I. M. (2022). Pedagogical Content Knowledge Guru dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Daring. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 281-292.

Restiana, N. (2018). Evaluasi profil TPACK untuk guru matematika sekolah menengah pertama di Banten. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 35(2), 167-178.

Rodrigues, S., Marks, A., & Steel, P. (2003). Developing science and ICT pedagogical content knowledge: A model of continuing professional development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40, 386-394.

Rogers, L. (2004). Integrating ICT into science education and the future. In R. Barton (ed.), Teaching secondary science with ICT. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.

Schmidt, D. A., Thompson, A. D., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Shulman, (1987). “Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the New Reform,” Harv. Educ. Rev., 57(1), 1987.

Sintawati, M., & Indriani, F. (2019). Pentingnya technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) guru di era revolusi industri 4.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pagelaran Pendidikan Dasar Nasional, 1(1), 417-422.

Susanti, L. (2021). Strategi Pembelajaran Online yang Inspiratif. Elex Media Komputindo.

Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Sormunen, K., Dillon, P., & Sointu, E. (2015). The impact of authentic learning experiences with ICT on pre-service teachers' intentions to use ICT for teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 81, 49-58.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-31

How to Cite

Sahidin, L., Kadir, Salim, & Pradjono, R. (2022). Eksplorasi TPACK dalam Mendukung Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.36709/jpm.v13i2.15

Issue

Section

Articles